Religious teaching Essay

Religious teachings carry the only sound basis for deterrent example reasoning. Critically strain arguments for and against this opinion.Morality is the knowledge and practice of what is righteous, which may, according to your individual(prenominal) great deal be instinctive, be associated with religion and culture, or be acquired by reasoning.Most, if non all religions accept a human clean-living code, which follows perfections will. Religious hoi polloi will consult their religious text, whether it is the Bible, Quran or Torah ect, when making a moral finish. Very often these religious texts will stick out a mint of rules or campaign lines. In Christianity it is the 10 Commandments, in Buddhism it is the 8 surface Path. Although these rules do provide a good moral base, if taken to their logical conclusion they ar intention and dogmatic, leaving no room for the flexibility needful in todays society.This is taking a Deontological approach this is when a psyche has a set of rules that they lead to be absolutely right. They abide by these rules, as they are more important than the loading or outcome. We lowlife use the example of spontaneous stillbirth and the 10 Commandments. These religious laws state that Thou shalt not kill. If taken absolutely this means that abortion is revile no matter what the circumstances are, even if the child will be natural firmly disabled or will be born(p) into extreme poverty.For many people moral value are relative to a specific society, sentence and circumstances, and their moral view can change by dint of changed circumstances, unavoidably, beliefs and knowledge. This flexibility is known as relativism and is the opposite of absolute. This is in like manner known as taking a of import approach, when a person looks to the outcome, and decides how to act to achieve that result. They feature in mind the aim and believe that put throughs can be deemed moral if they achieve that aim the mop up justifies the means. Because of this many individuals often experience conflict in making moral decisions because they have no absolute code of what is right or wrong. There are several different methods subjective moralityUtilitarianism is the view that you decide whether an action is right or wrong by looking at the consequences, and you should choose they action that will produce the most happiness/least-suffering to the superlative do of people. If we consider whether abortion is right or wrong using the utilitarianism view we would have to grade that it depends on the individual situation, and whether the baby would be born healthily or not, and whether the baby would be loved, and the number of people affected by the pregnancy, amongst separate things. indispensable Law states that morality should use the natural name of behaviour, and that humans and society should follow this natural law. Therefore anything that is deemed as un-natural is wrong. This means that in t he consequence of abortion it is always wrong, as pregnancy is a natural occurrence and it should not be finish un-naturally.Social contract theory claims that laws and morals are a human invention upon which we agree to exonerate life better for ourselves. When making a moral decision a person would have to consider the impact upon society and peoples freedom, amongst other things. Once again considering the case of abortion, a person using social contract theory, would consider the emergence having a baby would have on their lives, the lives of people around them, and how the life of the bay would be at once it is born.I conclude by saying that I think that religious teachings do not offer the only sound basis for moral reasoning. I feel that the individual situation also needs to be considered when making a moral decision as every case has different circumstances. I also feel that although the religious laws do turn back a good, sound basis for morality the bearing and abs olute rules stated by religion do not leave room for the flexibility necessitate in todays society.